This is what empowerment looks like: Rachel Lloyd speaks!
Imagine, if you need to imagine, growing up in a home with an alcoholic mother, one who swallows pills while you’re right in the room. Rather than ask for help, she encourages your young, teenage self, to go out clubbing, so she, unbeknownst to you, can die. This is the world that Rachel Lloyd, author of Girls Like Us: Fighting for a World Where Girls Are Not for Sale, an Activist Finds her Calling and Heals Herself
grows up in. Girls Like Us is the best book I’ve read in a quite some time. It’s around 250 pages, but the reading goes quickly, at least if you’re like me, and not sickness nor homework can make you put the book down!
For those of you for whom the name “Rachel Lloyd” does not ring a bell, Lloyd is the founder of the organization GEMS. GEMS assists girls and young women in getting out of “the life,” a name commonly used to refer to the world of paid rape (i.e. prostitution). While most of the book focuses on the individual stories, struggles, successes, and relapses, of girls in GEMS, what makes the book so powerful is that Lloyd interweaves her own tale of sexual exploitation and trafficking to make her points clearer. While arguing against the glamorization of pimping, she also explains that girls stay with their pimps for a reason. Indeed, Lloyd asks: why is it that the feminist movement no longer blames women for staying with batterers, but still sees women as making a choice to stay with a pimp? She also points out that pimps provide girls with things they desire, material things such as food, clothing, and shelter, but also a feeling of home. She describes girls who are found by pimps the first hour they get off the train after running away from a home that was not really a home. Pimps do not have to provide adolescents and pre-adolescents with much for them to feel cared for. Indeed, one GEMS participant describes going to a “fancy restaurant” for dinner; Lloyd later finds out the restaurant is Red Lobster, a popular chain restaurant in parts of the U.S. As I have been in an abusive relationship(s), this analogy made a lot of sense to me. Not everything was bad all the time. But eventually there becomes a point where the cons outweigh whatever one is getting from the relationship.
While Lloyd does describe pimps as an integral part of the lives of the girls she works with, it is important to note that not everyone who is prostituted has a pimp. Sometimes women end up prostituting themselves, for any of a myriad of reasons, most especially money, mental illness, and addiction. This may occur after pimping. I don’t want readers who have prostituted themselves for money or any other reason to feel badly reading this, as selling one’s body simply could not happen if there wasn’t a demand for it. Nor if women weren’t solely seen as The Sex Class.
Lloyd discusses choice in a brilliant way. After leaving a mother that could not take care of her, Lloyd ends up spending all day in a German city, desperately attempting to find a job. As she is not old enough to legally work and can only speak a word or two of German, she gets turned down from absolutely every place she looks for work. Without money and desperate for food, she sees a sign that says, Girls, Girls, Girls. This is how Lloyd makes the “choice” to work in a strip club–only until she can earn enough money to go back to her mother–but ends up meeting her pimp, JP, there (75).
Lloyd writes, “For a long time I’ve felt guilty about the way I entered the sex industry.” She has been told straight out that since she was “older” than most of the girls she works with (seventeen) “obviously she made a choice (77).” This kind of judgement is exactly what survivors fear from telling “square” people. This is not even to mention how harshly women judge themselves for their “choices.” That is why Lloyd tells the young women of GEMS that they need to forgive themselves in order to alleviate their profound sense of shame. Lloyd says to them, “Whatever you thought you had to do to survive or stay alive, it’s okay (77).” She does note that it’s easier to see the girls lack of choices as just that when looking at them from an outsiders perspective; when looking at one’s own life, it’s easier to say, “why didn’t I do X, Y, or Z?”
Lloyd’s book focuses on underage girls, even though Lloyd herself fights for abolition for all women and prostituted persons. She wonders why there are people–and I have encountered them as well–who think it’s perfectly fine for a 16-year-old to make the “choice” to enter the sex industry, when most parents are wary to give their car keys to a child that age (80)! Even if an adult woman does “choose” to enter the sex industry, there is no way she can no what she is getting herself into, or how she will never quite fit into the square world again. Always, there will be a wall, thin as glass, between you and the outside world.
For example, when Lloyd began working at the strip club, she had no idea this would eventually lead her to JP, who attempts to kill her on several occasions. With a knife at her throat, Lloyd must repeat that she loves JP and will not be unloyal. This begins at 3:14 a.m. and she must continue repeating the words, knife at throat, until 8:30 in the morning (151).
Lloyd describes another near-death experience, when a man she is seeing, Mike, drives her to a ditch in an attempt to murder her. However, she begs him to believe her when she says there is no one else she is seeing, and he “relents”–by making her take her shoes and socks off and run after the car for well over an hour. Lloyd’s feet are covered in blood by the time this exercise is over. Once back on the road with Mike, she runs out of the car and escapes to the police station. The police bring in Mike, but he makes up a story that she likes rough sex, and male cops being male cops, they buy it (122). Notably, there is a woman officer at the station who believes her, but she is not able to make the cops arrest Mike. Nor is she able to make Mike give back all of her savings he stole, which he now claims are his.
Although Lloyd leaves out many of the details of her time in the life, these stories by themselves are obviously incredibly disturbing. What kind of person would just say “prostitution should be decriminalized!” after reading this book, I find myself wondering. And yet, Lloyd has faced criticism from the left, apparently for being too religious. I find this extremely odd, because Lloyd rarely discusses religion, and certainly doesn’t preach it to her readers. If one actually reads her book, one will see she finds people who care about her in the church community. This acts as a crutch for her to move forward with her feminist and progressive, passions. This is not to say finding a higher power isn’t helpful to her, as it is to many people–including women and men in groups such as A.A.
I worry those who read this review will believe it is another incredibly depressing book about sex trafficking. But despite the horrors Lloyd so eloquently articulates, she is not only a survivor, but a thriver. She starts GEMS out of an act of desperation–you’ll have to read the book to find out all the details–but she now is able to provide the kind of support she would have wanted to get out of the life to female youth in NYC.
Oh, and Lloyd writes in her Acknowledgements: Thanks to my mother for supporting me in telling my story. I love you much and always, and I’m so glad we have the beautiful relationship that we now have. I’m proud of you and thankful you’re my mom. Truly.
It’s nice to know that some relationships are mendable.
Posted on October 15, 2011, in alternet, choice, GEMS, Girls Like Us, johns, listening to survivors, mens choices, objectification of women, pimps, porn industry, prostitution, prostitution abolitionist, rachel lloyd, rape, sexploitation industries, stripping, survivors, The Sex Class, the sex industry. Bookmark the permalink. 9 Comments.

Sounds like a great book. Thank you for the review!
I loved the book; every feminist should read it…as well as every porn apologist and “sex work advocate.”
Wow… just wow… I am reading this as soon as I can get my hands on it. Thank you for this review, and thank you for putting up with my questions on my blog by pointing me to books. It’s funny, I go to the “women’s studies” sections at places like Barnes n Nobles and get nada.. but there is a new feminist bookstore that just opened down the street from where I live! I can’t wait to see what they have.
Thanks for putting up with you???
It’s always a pleasure to see your comments here and elsewhere.
A new feminist bookstore?! Whoa. You are lucky. I didn’t realize there were ones still opening.
Thank you for the great review! There was also an article about this on Alternet. I actually haven’t read the article yet, but I would say that we absolutely need to tell personal stories in order to put a human face on the realities of sexual slavery, and I have so much respect for the women are who brave enough to speak about this. But of course, no woman is ever obligated to share the personal details of her life. But I also agree that we need scientific evidence, which we already have plenty of, but we need to have more recent studies.
“New Sex Slavery Memoir Tells a Powerful Tale — But Are Personal Stories the Best Way to Fight Exploitation?”
http://www.alternet.org/reproductivejustice/151153/new_sex_slavery_memoir_tells_a_powerful_tale_–_but_are_personal_stories_the_best_way_to_fight_exploitation?page=entire
WOAJ: Girl, I just now saw your response to this article that you left four months ago. What a misogynistic piece of tripe! Thanks for setting them straight. I’m going to write my own response as soon as I have the strength. In fact, I think I’ll copy and paste THIS:
What a misogynistic piece of tripe! Other publications such as The Guardian and even The Huffington Post have been doing a better job of exposing the sex (slave) industry for what it really is, and here Alternet sits there like part of the old boy’s network still trying to sweep away the harsh reality of it with the wave of the dismissive hand and dubious talk about “freedom,” which sounds much like talking about the “freedom” of sweatshop workers to “choose” to work for a Wal-Mart factory.
And I resent the way that “Jessica Mack” compared the abolitionist movement to the religious right, a tired old trick used by anti-feminists, “South Park conservatives,” pro-capitalists and so-called libertarians who have much more in common with the right than feminists ever did or ever will.
If the author of this article would have bothered to do five minutes of research (or tell the truth), she would know that most of the organizations dedicated to ending sex slavery are not religious at all, have no concern about “tradition morality,” would never want to take away a woman’s right choose especially BECAUSE so many women are trapped in the sex industry, and focus on things like education, ending demand, and eliminating poverty, rather then censorship.
Not to mention the numerous feminist bloggers who are survivors of the sex industry and speak out against it every day.
Here is just a small sample of completely non-religious, non-right wing, and non-censorship organizations that are dedicated to ending the sexual enslavement of women, children and men:
EVE (formerly Exploited Voices Educating)
VAWA (Woman Against Violence Against Women)
Free The Slaves
Not For Sale Campaign
Girls Are Not For Sale
Object!
End Human Trafficking Now
And, of course, GEMS, Girl’s Educational and Mentoring services, the organization founded by Rachel Lloyd, the author of the book.
The fact that HER OWN organization is an abolitionist group with absolutely no right-wing agenda at all whatsoever is something that somehow managed to escape your radar screen.
Besides these, there are countless other progressive organizations all over the third world working toward the same goal.
Also, you calling into question the author’s credibility–in the aggressive way that you did–was very insensitive and in poor taste. She’s not only an author looking for publicity but also the founder of a non-profit organization that reaches out to real life girls and women and helps them out of the sex industry.
Yes, I realize that memoirs are not always completely honest. I’m thinking of the guy who wrote “A Thousand Little Pieces,” about his story of drug addiction, and parts of it turned out to be false. However, are you now going to rake every memoir, biography, and true story over the coals the way you did to this one? Your dismissive treatment of her and insinuation that she’s a liar reminds of men who automatically accuse women of lying when they bravely tell their stories about being raped.
You have no evidence either way, no particular reason to doubt her, and every reason to take her word for it until you have some reason not to, and yet you treated her memoir–which must have taken a tremendous amount of courage to write–with more disrespect than I have ever seen a reviewer treat any memoir of anybody before in my entire life. There are probably celebrities who are much more apt to embellish their memoirs than this woman is, and yet they haven’t been held up to even half the amount of scorching scrutiny you subjected this survivor and activist to endure.
I’ve always thought of Alternet as a progressive web site that supports women’s rights. Therefore, I’m disappointed that they would publish such a patriarchal piece of crap, and have the nerve to do it under a female byline.
http://www.alternet.org/reproductivejustice/151153/new_sex_slavery_memoir_tells_a_powerful_tale_–_but_are_personal_stories_the_best_way_to_fight_exploitation/comments/
Boadie,
Yes, it gets frustrating arguing with those pro-pornsitutioners at Alternet. Even if Lloyd did have a Christian organization–which she doesn’t–does that mean she is a liar? I got so much out of reading her book, and I’m not speaking of facts learned. I’m talking about lessons I can apply to the way I think about organizing, to my interactions with people, and on and on.
I actually did a post about my frustration with some of the lefty boy posters, especially at Alternet awhile back. It should be in the archives. I can try to find it for you later.
Great review.
She wonders why there are people–and I have encountered them as well–who think it’s perfectly fine for a 16-year-old to make the “choice” to enter the sex industry, when most parents are wary to give their car keys to a child that age
This is really the laughable argument of the pro-sex lobby. I don’t think there is any place in the world where a 16yo is even allowed to vote, nor in most countries is anyone under the age of 18 considered an adult. But, make it about going into sex slavery, and then somehow, magically, it is the woman’s choice. They are still teenagers ffs, and teenagers are notorious for making some silly decisions. But most are really driven into prostitution due to lack of financial alternatives, like the author.
The pro-pornstitution people are full of hypocrisy on every level.